Petrus Christus dress

I did mean to leave the actual dress until last, but my plans to start the headdress for this were somewhat derailed by technical problems beyond my control, so I started the dress this weekend.

There is some debate over whether the dresses of the late c15th had a waist seam or not, and I’ve done versions both with and without in the past. This time I’ve decided to go with the waist seam because a) I’ve found it more economical in it’s use of fabric whilst obtaining maximum skirt swishiness (technical term) and b) I find it gives a more elegant fall to the skirt whilst simultaneously allowing a better fit to the bodice.

Also, I’m a right lazy cow, and this method give you a good level hem every time without any effort, and the lining never gives any bother either.

Normally I would start with two long pieces of fabric sewn up the side to make  a square, then cut that into a circle (the offcuts make the sleeves and body with nowt left but the tailor of Gloucester’s “tippets for mice”) but due to the nap of the velvet I made my square from four pieces this time, so the nap will always fall vaguely down

pet circle

I basted the lining to the outer fabric along the centre seam to stop it shifting. This is invisible from the front and will not be removed.

pet seam

The whole thing is flat-felled using unbleached linen thread – you can’t see it on the velvet and I’m not really bothered about it being visible on the black linen lining. I then basted around the entire hem to hold it until I finish it, but I used red linen for that.

pet skirt

I love the way the light bounces off this. I haven’t used velvet for over twenty years because I wasn’t able to get anything of a quality I was content with – I would rather use something else and make a different costume than compromise. The more I look at this the more I think that anyone using cotton velvet and insisting you can’t tell the difference must be either blind or deluded.

I still haven’t decided what to do with the hem though, so It’s probably just as well that I need to set it aside for a week or so. The painting has just the tiniest wee hint of a fur lining poking out, so tiny as to be barely discernable – we aren’t talking about the wide contrasting bands often seen at the hems of frocks like this. I’ve got fur for the collar and cuffs, and I do have some more I could use around the bottom, but I don’t think I have enough to line it and I’m not sure I want to since I’ll mostly be wearing it in summer. This leaves me with three options-1) finish the hem by simply folding the velvet and lining together, 2) do  very very thin band of fur around the bottom to approximate the painting (which could look a bit wierd when the dress is lifted), or 3) do a brown silk velvet facing.

I’ll probably go with option 2 in the end, but I need to mull it over for a bit – mostly cos fur is a pain to work with and I always put it off til the last minute like maths homework

Actually, not like maths homework, I don’t think I ever did any maths homework when I was at school.

~ by opusanglicanum on May 6, 2013.

6 Responses to “Petrus Christus dress”

  1. Fur and velvet – are you a masochist or what? Plus you are absolutely right about silk velvet vs cotton. There is no comparison.

    • I am undoubtedly a masochist. Although I am finding this stuff far more manageable than the last time I treid to do anyhting with cotton velvet

      Btw, gareht wanted me to make macaron so he could send them to his friends, and I made too many so he’s popping a box in the post for you too – I’ll sort the beads out later, it was all too complicated this morning

  2. The only cotton velvet I’ve ever seen was too stiff and bulky to fall nicely gathered up like that. Fine for curtains…! In any case, how early do we have evidence of cotton being used in Europe?

    • theres some pretty early evidence for southern europe, cos it was grown in eygpt fairly early on. and if memory serves me right the earliest for england is two ragged strands of cotton thread found down a roman well, but it doesn’t seem to have become at all common until the age of empire – which makes sense when you think about it from a merchants point of view, cso why would you drag bulky cheap cotton back from your travels when you could bring lightwieght profitable silk instead? In the medieval period it can be quite confusing cos there is a fabric called cotton which is generally held to be a lightwieght wool. Lets just say its s subject of much debate and considerable conjecture and leave it at that

  3. Yay! You’re using that silk velvet! Swishy and squashy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: